Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9893 (JHR)

AGINDRA RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/152/2025 · 2026-02-06

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3180 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt (Civil) Case No. 151 of 2025 With Contempt (Civil) Case No. 152 of 2025 ------ Sanjay Dubey, son of Badri Bishal Dubey, resident of Teachers Colony, Vaishnavi Vihar, tupudana, P.O Hatia, P.S. Tupudana, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner (Cont. 151 of 2025) Agindra Ram, son of Sri Chalitar Ram, resident of village and P.O Asehar, P.S. Panki, District Palamau, Jharkhand. …Petitioner (Cont. 152 of 2025) -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, the Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, at MDI Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Mr. Prashant Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. Mr. Aditya Ranjan, the Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, at MDI Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. … Opp. Parties (in both cases) 5. Smt. Apurba Kumar Chaudhary the District Education Officer, Khunti, P.O and P.S. And District- Khunti, Jharkhand....Opp. Party (Cont. 151 of 2025) 5. Mr. Saurabh Prakash, the District Education Officer, at Medininagar, P.O & P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand. ...Opp. Party(Cont. 152 of 2025) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): M/s Indrajit Sinha and Arpan Mishra, Advocates. For the State Mr. S. Bhowmik, AC to SC-V Mr. Anuj Burman, AC to GA-IV ------ 06/06.02.2026: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 10.6.2024 passed in WP(S) Nos. 4249 and 4753 of 2022 has been complied with. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, these contempt cases are dropped. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate application challenging the order passed by the opposite parties. 06th February, 2026 (ANANDA SEN, J.) Anu/-Cp2. Uploaded on: 07.02.2026