Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9890 (CHH)

KAMAL AHMAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3730/2026 · 2026-04-28

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19863 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3730 of 2026 1 - Kamal Ahmad S/o Jamal Mohammad Aged About 61 Years Presently Posted As Deputy Ranger, Forest Range. Keshkal (General) Forest Division Keshkal, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Aranya Bhawan North Block, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Forest Circle Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. 4 - Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division Keshkal, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh. -- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Addl. A.G. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 29/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the pending representation (Annexure P-11) of the petitioner especially Respondent No.2 and 3. 10.2) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post from Deputy BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 Ranger to Ranger with all consequential benefits as juniors to the petitioner have already been promoted in the month of November, 2025 (Annexure P-8). 10.3) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to the representation/application submitted by petitioner, seniority of petitioner has been corrected and he is placed at appropriate place in gradation list, however, he has not been considered for promotion from the post of Deputy Ranger to Ranger. Aggrieved with which, petitioner has submitted representation dated 25.12.2025 (Annexure P-11), before respondent No.2, which till date is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to concerned authorities to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner within shortest possible time as petitioner is due to retire on 30.06.2026. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the pending representation submitted by petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 5. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties and nature of relief as prayed for, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of 3 one month from the date of receipt of this order keeping in mind the date of superannuation of petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram