Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 989 (HP)

CHAINA RAM v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/3615/2026 · 2026-03-24

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.3615 of 2026 Decided on 24th March, 2026 Chaina Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- “That a writ in nature of mandamus or may other appropriate writ, order of directions may kindly be issued directing the respondents to rectify the record of the petitioner to continue in service till attainment the age of 60 years with all consequential benefits incidental thereof.” 2. In light of the prayer made in the writ petition, as agreed, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall be bound by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court that shall be passed in Satya Devi’s case. 2 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 24, 2026 (Vinod)