Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 989 (CAL)

MANOJ SANA v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

CRM (A)/136/2026 · 2026-02-13

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.28 ssi CRM (A) 136 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita 2023. And In the matter of: Manoj Sana …. Petitioner. Mr. Debajyoti Deb Mr. Supriya Mahajan …for the petitioner Mr. Amajit De, Spl. PP …for the CBI Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail as he has received notice from the CBI. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the CBI submits that the petitioner has been made a witness in a case, which though started here, has been transferred to Delhi and trial is going on. It is RC Case no. RC0102020A0019 dated 21.09.2020. As the petitioner is not an accused in this case, the application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. In view of the above, the application for anticipatory bail is disposed of as infructuous. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)