Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RFA29002013 (O&M)
and
other connected cases 2
! "
#
#$ ! %& “the Reference Court” ' ( ) !* ! (+" “1894 Act” $
, - ).
% * #$ ##/ # #$ ##0 ' "1/ (+" ! “for the development and utilization for residential and commercial Sector 23 part, Bhiwani” . * ( "/ . ) !* 2 “the LAC” ( #( ##( * 34 " )!2 , ' ( (+"! 5 4 2 " # #$ , 34 $6###7, (+"! 6 ' SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 3 4 2 , 8, / 9 : * - ) “the development and utilization of land for residential and commercial Sector 23 part, Bhiwani.” ;
' $ #" #/ +(/ ' " (+"! ) < 34 0+ +( * 2 LPA No.1089 of 2000 Om Parkash vs. State of Haryana * * = = ' $ > = 3"? * #" #/ +(/ ' " (+" ! #$ ##/ ; * / 9 ) / #" ##0 ' " (+"! SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 4 “residentialcumcommercial plots/land for Sector 31, Bhiwani”, , 4 2 4 "# Nehri/Chahi > 4 6#
4, gair mumkin / 4 4 $# Taal 2 6 #6 # RFA$ 5571$2011 State of Haryana vs. Shashi Prabha ; , / #" ##0 ' " (+"! , 3 "?
/ #" ##0 , 4 ####7, . , 0 < # ### @= <, , @= 4,4,0 * = 4 > 4 2 3 4 $6###7, , ; SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 5 * = * 0 ) ' , 2 6 #6 # Shashi Prabha’s case - ) / #" ##0
* 6 * ; , * "? * ' $ ;5%! #" #/ +(/ * ; , 8, ( 9 , + 9 , * ,' 8, SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 6 !" #""#$ %"!&"# '()* +, -." (("!!
*- $! *#)/*"% $ %" $ '*#"% 0.&+&- !" #""# # -" %" 1&!! 2" !" 3)*$&#"% -&)* $" (%&3" ("% 3%" @=
<
#
### ( < 4
$/###7, 4
0####7, @=
<2 #$
#$
##/ ( ) 4
0###7, 4
"####7, @=
<$ #$
#/
##6 # ) 4
+####7, 4
""####7, !" #""#$ %"!&"# '()* +, -." %"$()*#"*-- -" %" $ '*#"% 0.&+&- !" #""# # -" %" 1&!! 2" !" 3)*$&#"% -&)* $" (%&3" ("% 3%" @=
4, +
#6
##6 ) 4
(6##7, 4
#####7, @=
4,$
#+
##6 $A ) 4
####7, 4
"+$#07, @=
4,"
#+
##6 $A ) 4
####7, 4
"+$#07, @=
4,6
#+
##6
"A ) 4
####7, 4
$0/"0#7, @=
4,/
#(
##6 ) 4
0####7, 4
6/####7, @=
4,0 #
#6
##6 # ) 4
"####7, 4
/"####7, +
9 * = ' $ ;5%! * * ; B ' 2 CHaryana State Industrial Development Corp.
v. Pran Sukh” 2010 (11) SCC 175 * )!2 SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RFA29002013 (O&M)
and
other connected cases 7 %2 4
.2
= 2
4 Pran Sukh’s case (supra) 8,
“22. In our view, the learned Single Judge did not commit any error by relying upon sale transaction Exhibit P1 for the purpose of fixing market value of the acquired land. Undisputedly, that sale transaction was between two corporate entities and the entire sale price was paid through bank drafts. It is also not in dispute that the land which was subjectmatter of Exhibit P1 is situated at village Naharpur Kasan and is adjacent to the acquired land. The Corporation and the State Government did not adduce any evidence to prove that the land sold vide Exhibit P1 was overvalued with an oblique motive of helping the land owners to claim higher compensation. Therefore, we do not find any justification to discard or ignore sate deed Exhibit P1. The refusal of the learned Single Judge to rely upon other sale transactions in which sale price of the land was shown as Rs. 7 lakhs per acre also does not suffer from any legal infirmity because its well$known that transactions involving transfer of properties are usually undervalued with a view to avoid payment of the requisite stamp duty and registration chars.
# - ) < % * 4565 “for setting up of Sector 23, HUDA, Bhiwani” (hereinafter referred to as the ‘previous acquisition’) . 5 ' " (+"! - ) , * “for the development and utilization for residential and commercial Sector 23 part, Bhiwani” SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RFA29002013 (O&M)
and
other connected cases 8 Dpresent acquisition’
) 547 - )< E * Cfor Residential cum commercial plots/land for Sector 31, Bhiwani” Dsubsequent acquisition’ . * - ) = 8, %"8&)'$ 39'&$&-&)* %"$"*- 39'&$&-&)* '+$"9'"*- 39'&$&-&)* )-&:&3 -&)* '*#"% "3-&)* 4 #"
#/
+(/
#$
##/ /
#"
##0 )-&:&3 -&)* '*#"% "3-&)* 5 6
#"
+(0 #
#$
##0 /
#6
##( 1&!!
2" ) < ) )< E '+!&3 '%()$" ' ' $;5%! % F ' $ 4 7 ' $ / %# -" ; <)'*- # +(07G - 4 606##7, E 4 66##7, . H ( #( ##(7 4 #####7, $ #" ##74 # E 72 4 6 4, H G 4 $######7, ":"%"*3" )'%- / %# -" ; <)'*- - 34 67, * " # #$7 3 4 $6###7, 4 "# Nehri/Chahi > 4 6# 4, gair mumkin / 4 4 $# Taal <)'*- #"3&#"# +, -.&$ )'%- 4!,+"0,++" ( # +++ ' % ' ,,,,, 4!,660,# 6 #6 # ' ; '< SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 9 ; 34 0+ +( * 4 2 ; )<!E #(+,### 6 ### I < ' ; 4! 34 0+ +( * ,,,,, ')<E 0#0,0#0 #$ # ' 1 ) !* 2 2 #
* #" #/ +(/ - ) * “for setting up of Sector 23, HUDA, Bhiwani” * 2 6 ### LPA No. 1089$2000 Om Parkash’s case 4 0+ +( * . = # #$ ##/ * = = ' $<;5%! . 4 2 6 = 8, “…...though they pointed out the cross examination of RW1 during which he deposed that Sector 23 was acquired in the year 1988 which is fully developed now and it is correct deposed that awards No. 3 and 4 were announced for the extension of Sector 23.
It is true that land had been acquired by the Government for extension of Sector 23 HUDA for which notification under Section 4 of the Act had been published on 21.03.2006 whereas Sector 23 already had itself in 1988 and been acquired thereafter, SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 10 residential colony was set up therein after making developments of all kinds of facilities for its of inhabitants but the rate prevailing in developed Sector 23 cannot be taken into account for fixation of market value of its the purpose extended part acquired by the respondents in view of the notification published under section 4 of the Act 21.03.2006 being barred by clauses fifthly and sixthly of section 24 of the Act…..” # ; 4 2 * = ' " (+"! = * 9 * * ' $ #$ ##/ * # $ 9 ' $ , * , = . * =
. Cfrom the use to which it will be put when acquiredJ * 4 SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 11 * 2 * = * * G 2 +(/,(0> ##/,##0 ' 2 = 8, =" % )!!"3-)% -"$ :)% 1&!! 2" .&/ *& ). % ("% 3%" 6567 E 4
6####7, HG 4
"(###7, 57 E 72 4
((####7, HG 4
#####7, !
= ($ nehri/chahi gair mumkin - ) /?(? 9 2 = ' = = * = ' $;5%! * (? 2 6 ### Om Parkash’s case SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 12 - ) 34 0+ +( * #" #/ +(/ 4 0/"+7, ' / #" ##0 ' " (+"! - ) * “for residential cumcommercial plots/land for Sector 31, Bhiwani” 4 2 4 "# Nehri/Chahi >4 6# 4, gair mumkin / 4 4 $# Taal 2 6 #6 # Shashi Prabha’s case . *
- ) ' " (+"! #$ ##/ . , "? $ / #" ##0 #$ ##/ 4 $# 6 #6 # Shashi Prabha’s case 4 ####7, $ 2 * 2 , * SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA29002013 (O&M) and other connected cases 13 * #" #/ +(/ * * / #" ##0 * F " ! * 3 $ >>74?
; ("% 3%"
9 (+"! 6 9 / , , = , > 0
<
#"
#/
@ A A K 7 8 L K 8 L '
E
2 E '
E 2 E RFA-10480-2014 # RFA-4257-2013 RFA-10481-2014 RFA-4258-2013 $ RFA-10482-2014 RFA-4259-2013 SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RFA29002013 (O&M)
and
other connected cases 14
" RFA-10483-2014 $ RFA-4260-2013 6 RFA-10484-2014 " RFA-4261-2013 / RFA-3024-2013 6 RFA-4851-2013 0 RFA-3025-2013 / RFA-4852-2013 ( RFA-3026-2013 0 RFA-4853-2013 + RFA-3027-2013 ( RFA-4854-2013 # RFA-3028-2013 + RFA-4855-2013 RFA-3974-2013 $# RFA-5204-2013 RFA-3975-2013 $ RFA-5205-2013 $ RFA-3976-2013 $ RFA-5429-2013 " RFA-4129-2013 $$ RFA-6387-2013 6 RFA-4130-2013 $" RFA-6388-2013 / RFA-4131-2013 $6 RFA-9738-2014 0 RFA-4132-2013 $/ RFA-3686-2014 ( RFA-4255-2013 $0 RFA-18-2016 + RFA-4256-2013
#"
#/
@ A A SONIKA 2026.05.07 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document