APHC010371162026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19943/2026 Between: 1. RAGIPATI KRISHNAIAH, S/O. PONDAIAH AGE 61 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O. GONU NARASAYAPALEM VILLAGE RAPURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 2. MANGANAPURI RAVANAMMA, W/O. RAYIPADU VENKATAIAH AGE 68 YEARS, R/O. GIDDALURU VILLAGE SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE-524001 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524001 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SYDAPURAM MANDAL SYDAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524407 5. THE MANDAL DEPUTY SURVEYOR, SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SYDAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT -524407 6. RAGIPATI HARI BABU, S/O. RAMANAIAH AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O. UTUKURU VILLAGE SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT -524407 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents No. 4 and 5 in trying to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to the 1st petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner, under the guise of the notices dated 22.06.2026 and 14.07.2026 based on the representation of the 6th Respondent herein as illegal, high-handed, arbitrary, ultra vires, against the principles of natural justice, and contrary to law, apart from being in blatant violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to 1st petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to interfere with petitioners’ possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to 1®* petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. KALUVA YAMINI NIKITHA The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents. 2. Assailing the notice dated 22.06.2026 (Ex.P1), the above writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are the absolute owners and possessors of Ac.3.00 cents each in S.Nos.7-1P39 and 7-1P29 respectively of Komatikunta Rajupalem village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPRS Nellore District. The names of the petitioners were updated in records of rights, and the copies of pattadar pass books, adangals and 1B are filed as Exs.P2 to P4. He would submit that the respondents 4 and 5 are highhandedly trying to dispossess the petitioners from the aforementioned lands. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the aforementioned lands are in possession and enjoyment of the petitioners for 25 years and they raised lemon crop in the said land. The 4th respondent has neither initiated any action against the petitioners nor interfered with their possession and enjoyment of the lands, and the petitioners approached this Court with an apprehension only. The instructions are made part of the order. 5. Given the instructions of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, keeping the writ petition and inviting a counter will not serve any purpose. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with an extent of Ac.3.00 cents each in S.Nos.7- 1P39 and 7-1P29 respectively of Komatikunta Rajupalem village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPRS Nellore District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD