[2026:RJ-JP:26211] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7615/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13877U / 2026 Rikas @ Rinku S/o Jagdish Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Butana Kundu, Police Station Baraunda District Sonipat Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar Mr. Sanju Buldak For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Vidhut Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred the present bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) in connection with FIR No. 415/2023 registered at Police Station Khandela, District Sikar for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor, as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the statements of witnesses have been recorded as PW-1 to PW-6, out of whom PW-1-Mukesh, PW-2-Mahipal, PW-5- [2026:RJ-JP:26211] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7615/2026] Mukesh S/o Babulal Saini, and PW-6-Suman have turned hostile. Learned counsel further submits that there is no injury attributable to the alleged weapon of offence and though a pistol has been recovered from the petitioner, no injury has been found to have been caused by the said firearm. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2023 with one criminal past and the trial is likely to take considerable time. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, and hence, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that there is substantial evidence available on record against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is involved in a similar nature of offence and the evidence of PW-2-Mahipal and PW-4- Phoolchand supports the prosecution case against the petitioner. It is argued that considering the nature of the offence and the material available on record, the bail application filed by the petitioner is liable to be rejected. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the complainant, the statements of PW-2-Mahipal and PW-4-Phoolchand, and also taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is alleged to be involved in an offence of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to allow the present bail application filed by the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:26211] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7615/2026] 6. Consequently, the present bail application is hereby dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 28/Arun