[2026:RJ-JP:25894] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8658/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15834U / 2026 Abdul Khalid S/o Shri Subbi, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kheda (Khora) Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Jamsi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 09/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 18.05.2026 passed by the learned Addtional District & Sessions Judge Brijnagar, District Deeg in Bail Application No.289/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.43/2018, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 420, 392, 384, 342 & 34 of the IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the absconder namely Shahjad against whom the challan was filed under Section 299 Cr.P.C. has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court. Another accused-Saddik has already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8025/2018 vide order dated 17.07.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits [2026:RJ-JP:25894] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8658/2026] that the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the co-accused namely Saddik & Sahjad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 08.05.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and contends that there is one case of theft against the present petitioner, therefore, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; all the offences are triable by Magistrate, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Abdul Khalid S/o Shri Subbi arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.43/2018, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing [2026:RJ-JP:25894] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8658/2026] and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 86/MAHIMA