Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 988 (RAJ)

AMIT JAIN AND ANOTHER v. BANK OF BARODA AND OTHERS

CMA/1028/2013 · 2026-02-24

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8547] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1028/2013 1. Amit Jain son of Shri Satbeer Singh Jain, age 46 Years. 2. Smt. Vinita Jain Wife of Shri Amit Jain, age 45 Years. Residents of A-129, Mehtab House, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. Bank Of Baroda, International Banking Division, Ahinsa Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through its Manager. 2. M/s Indo Gem Company, Proprietorship Firm] 336, Lalaniyon ka Chowk, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur. 3. Smt Shashi Bala Jain Wife of Late Shri Sudarshan Singh Jain. 4. Shri Rishabh Jain Son of Late Shri Sudarshan Singh Jain. 5. Shri Puneet Jain Son of Late Shri Sudarshan Singh Jain. 6. Shri Ritul Jain Son of Late Shri Sudarshan Singh Jain. 7. Shri Sharad Jain Son of Late Shri Sudarshan Singh Jain. No. 3 to 7 are Residents of E-187, Azad Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 8. Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, S.F.E./3/4, Nehru Palace, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 24/02/2026 vLFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds vkosnu ij ikfjr vkns'k ds fo#) ;g vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ewy okn gh fnukad 21-10-2024 dks fu.khZr gksuk nksuksa i{kksa }kjk gh Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g vihy fu"Qy gks pqdh gSA [2026:RJ-JP:8547] (2 of 2) [CMA-1028/2013] fygktk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J BISRAT ALI /30