APHC010592852014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5173 OF 2014 Between: 1. SREE T.G.V. PHARMA PVT. LTD., KURNOOL DIST, Unit 4 of Sree Rayalaseema Histrength Hypo Ltd, Gondiparla village of Kurnool District, (H.T. Service No.KNL 355). ...Petitioner AND 1. MD APCPDCL MINT COMPOUND HYDERABAD 3 OTHERS, Rep. by its Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief General Manager O M, APCPDCL, 4th floor, Corporate Office, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited at Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, Central Power distribution Company of A.P. Limited, Kunool, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus" by declaring the inaction of the respondents in 2 considering the petitioner company as HT-continuous process industry as per recommendations made by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings dated 24-09- 2012 and thereby raising demanding on the petitioner company by directing the petitioner company to pay the balance of amount arising out of the R & C charges by treating the petitioner company as HT-1 other than continuous process industries in respect of Service No's HT KNL-355 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19 (1) (g) of Constitution of India and further declare the action of the respondents in not adjusting the amount of waiver of 50% penalties imposed against the petitioner during the R & C period as illegal and further declare the action of the respondents in raising the supplementary bill for the month of September, 2012 on the petitioner company as illegal in the interest of justice and equity and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 6424 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents forebear from collecting penal charges from the petitioner company due to noncompliance of R & C measures pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: ALLADI RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: O MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) Counsel for the Respondents:Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5173 OF 2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.09.2026 BSP/DS 4 5 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5173 OF 2014 09.09.2026 BSP/DS