HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/395/2026 · 2026-05-20
Avneesh Jhingan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9872 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9872 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 395/2026
HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dhriti Mehta, Mr. Jeevan Ballav Panda and Mr. Saurabh Samraat, Advs.
versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Himaangini Mehta, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
O R D E R %
20.05.2026
1. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made.
3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by twelve months.
4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 20, 2026/Pa
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 12:45:29