Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9871 (AP)

Shahifur Rehaman Mohammed v. Mohammed Shirajuddin

CRLRC/979/2026 · 2026-09-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010440402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 979/2026 Between: 1. SHAHIFUR REHAMAN MOHAMMED, S/O IBRAHIM, AGED 54 YEARS R/Q FLAT NO. 204, SRI PADMAVATHI RESIDENCY, MADHAVADHARAVUDA COLONY, 48 BUS STOP, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MOHAMMED SHIRAJUDDIN, S/O LATE MD. SAHIN, 35 YEARS,BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 32-14-3,ATCHAYYAMPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S S NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NUTHALAPATI MOHAN 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The case of the Respondent No.1/Complainant is that the Petitioner/Accused borrowed Rs.1,00,000/- and, towards part payment of the debt, issued a cheque for Rs.9,000/-, which was twice dishonoured for “Funds insufficient”. Despite issuance of a statutory legal notice dated 23.10.2015, the Petitioner/Accused neither paid the cheque amount nor issued any reply. Accordingly, a complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the N.I. Act was filed in C.C.No.73 of 2016, which was allowed on merits by judgment dated 06.05.2019. 2. The order dated 08.09.2026 passed by this Court has been complied with. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 11.09.2026 KMS 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 979/2026 Date: 11.09.2026 KMS 215