[2026:RJ-JP:10325] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1501/2025 1. Komal Rathore W/o Anand Kumar, D/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) Presently R/o Village Madansar, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, (Raj.) 2. Anand Kumar S/o Late Data Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Madansar, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur Rajasthan 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 6. Sarda W/o Narendra Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) (Mother Of Petitioner No. 1) 7. Vikram Singh Rathore S/o Ladu Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) 8. Lokendra Singh Rathore S/o Ladu Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) 9. Ramotar Singh Rathore S/o Hanuman Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) Presently R/o Tarachand Nagar, Khirni Phatak, Jothwara, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) 10. Lal Singh Rathore S/o Hanuman Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) [2026:RJ-JP:10325] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1501/2025] Presently R/o Tarachand Nagar, Khirni Phatak, Jothwara, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) 11. Satveer Singh Rathore S/o Chain Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) Presently R/o Tarachand Nagar, Khirni Phatak, Jothwara, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) 12. Jagbir Singh Rathore S/o Chain Singh Rathore, R/o Village Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana, (Raj.) Presently R/o Tarachand Nagar, Khirni Phatak, Jothwara, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Satyendra Singh Raghav, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 to 12 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Apex Tower, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 12.11.2025 and same has been [2026:RJ-JP:10325] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1501/2025] registered on 12.11.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. It is submitted that one D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No.33/2026 was also filed before Division Bench of this Court by private respondent No.6 where petitioner No.1 appeared before Division Bench of this Court and submitted that she is not in illegal detention and is residing with her husband, who is petitioner No.2. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 to 12 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /195