COCP-1016 IN THE HI 111 Chanan Sing Vijay Kumar CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW of Punjab an following ob 2. terms of th representatio not been dec 16-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o n Singh Versus Kumar Garg and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. HS Saini, Advocate for the Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 14.07.2025 (Annex CWP-21319-2014, titled as ‘Chana and others’ whereby the writ peti ing observations:- “xxx xxx 3. In view of the above, instructions states that in case, within 4 weeks, the same will period of 3 months from its rece 4. Disposed of accordingly are found entitled, the benefit b to say, if orders are adverse to after granting opportunity of contain reasons, whereby the redress thereupon.” It is submitted by learned coun of the order reproduced above, t entation dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure en decided till date. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1016-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Chanan Singh and another vs. State rit petition was disposed of with the xxx ove, learned State counsel, on e, the representation/s are filed will be decided within a further receipt, in accordance with law. ingly. However, if the petitioners fit be released forthwith. Needless e to them, the same may be passed y of hearing to them and shall they shall be free to seek legal d counsel for the petitioner that in ove, the petitioner has moved a exure P-2), however, the same has ging Writ tate the on ed er rs ss ed all al t in d a has RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1016 3. the represent stands duly 17.12.2025 4. Court is tak learned coun 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. Speaking O action still su 8. 9. 09.03.2026 rishu 16-2026 -2- Per Contra, learned counsel for resentation dated 08.08.2025 (Annexu duly decided by the respondents 2025. As such, nothing survives in the Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, i still survives. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable sel for the respondents submits that nnexure P-2) filed by the petitioner dents vide Speaking Order dated in the present petition. r dated 17.12.2025 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised or any cause of any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No that ated r in d to are sed said e of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.