Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9866 (RAJ)

GARIMA GAUTTAM D/O BRAJENDRA GAUTTAM W/O PRIYANSH RAJPUT, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/983/2026 · 2026-07-02

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24669] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 983/2026 URN: CRLW / 3934U / 2026 1. Garima Gauttam D/o Brajendra Gauttam W/o Priyansh Rajput, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bagor, District Karauli, Presently R/o Udai Kalan Rural, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 2. Priyansh Rajput S/o Harsahay Rajput, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Udai Kalan Rural, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent of Police, Sawai Madhopur. 3. SHO, Police Station Udei Mode, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Brijendra Gautam S/o Hajarilal Gautam, R/o Udei Kalan, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. 5. Sunita Gautam W/o Brijendra Gautam, R/o Udei Kalan, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. 6. Mukesh Gautam S/o Hajarilal Gautam, R/o Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 7. Ashwani S/o Mukesh Gautam, R/o Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 8. Prateek Gautam S/o Murari Lal Gautam, R/o Agra Road, Jaipur. 9. Nikhil Gautam S/o Sajjan Gautam, R/o Agra Road, Jaipur. 10. Priyanshu Gautam S/o Mangal Gautam, R/o Agra Road, Jaipur. 11. Shubham Gautam S/o Murarilal Gautam, R/o Agra Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Jogi with Mr. Aryan Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 02/07/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:24669] (2 of 3) [CRLW-983/2026] 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 11 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, 201-202, Second Floor Apex Towar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 06.03.2026 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.4 to 11 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Udei Mode, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. [2026:RJ-JP:24669] (3 of 3) [CRLW-983/2026] 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 246/LALIT MOHAN