Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9861 (ALL)

VIRENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15911/2026 · 2026-09-29

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15911 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to release the leave encashment of Rs.7,96,600/- with interest @ 14% in favour of petitioner regarding earn leave. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 11.03.2026 with stipulated period. III. Issue any other writ, order or direction in suitable nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 3. Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner, regarding non payment of leave encashment, can be more appropriately redressed by the General Manager (Finance & Account) (respondent no.3) and that he has no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation before the General Manager (Finance & Account) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Braj Bhushan Rai, Sunil Kumar-I Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vivek Kumar Rai Virendra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) (respondent no.3) ventilating his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of the same, if there is no other legal impediment. 5. With the aforesaid directions and observations, present writ petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 vkg WRIA No. 15911 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad