[2026:RJ-JP:10850] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2855/1989 Smt. Champa W/o Bhonrya (Since deceased) 1. Smt. Chhoti Bai 2. Chatu son of Bhoriya (since deceased) through legal representatives:- (2/1/1) Smt. Imarti Devi widow of Jugal Kishore (2/1/2) Tej pal son of late Shri Jugal Kishore (2/1/3) Jagdish son of late Shri Jugal Kishore (2/1/4) Sher Singh son of late Shri Jugal Kishore (2/1/5) Manoj son of late Shri Jugal Kishore (2/1/6) Sanjay son of late Shri Jugal Kishore (2/1/2 to 2/1/6 grandsons of late shri Chatu) (2/2/7) Panna Lal son of Chatu (2/2/8) Shiv Lal S/o Chatu (since deceased) Through legal representatives:- (2/2/8/1) Hemant s/o late Shri Shiv Lal Chatu (2/2/8/2) Bijender s/o late Shri Shiv Lal Chatu (2/2/8/3) Ashok s/o late Shri Shiv Lal Chatu 3. Hukum Chand son of Murli 4. Khemchand son of Murli 5.Chimanlal son of Murli 6. Smt. Kamla wife of Jagdish Resident of Mubaarakpur, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar. 7. Smt. Bina daughter of Murli 8. Smt. Panni daughter of Murli 9. Smt. Chandri daughhter of Murli (Minor) C/o natural brother Hukumchand Mali 10. Mamraj son of Bhonrya (deceased) (10/1) Goverdhan Saini son of late Shri Mamraj Saini (10/2) Tota Ram Saini son of late Shri Mamraj Saini (pre- deceased) (10/2/1) Dhammo widow of late Shri Tota Ram Saini (10/2/2) Bhavani Saini son of late Shri Tota Ram Saini (10/2/3) Kamal Saini son of late Shri Tota Ram Saini (10/2/4) Rohitash Saini son of late Shri Tota Ram Saini (10/2/5) Mahender Saini son of late Shri Tota Ram Saini All residents of Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District-Alwar. 11. Chutan son of Bhoriya 12. Smt. Barfi W/o Bhoma D/o Bhariya (since deceased) through legal representatives:- (12/1) Banwari son of late Bhima Ram (12/2) Amar Singh son of late Bhima Ram (12/3) Madan Lal son of late Bhima Ram Resident of Malviyanagar, Alwar. 13. Smt. Panchi W/o Bhagwan D/o Bhonrya (since deceased) through legal representatives:- (13/1) Daulat Ram son of late Shri Bhagwan (13/2) Moti Lal son of late Shri Bhagwan Residents of bavdi wala kua, 200 feet Road, Alwar (Raj.) 14. Choti W/o Kaluram D/o Bhonrya [2026:RJ-JP:10850] (2 of 4) [CW-2855/1989] All resident of Ramgarh, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Board of Revenue, Ajmer 2. Murti Mandir Shri Thakurji Raghunathji, Maharaj C/o (2/1) Rajnarayan Parek son of late shri Roop Narain (Since deceased) through legal representatives:- (2/1/1) Manju Pareek W/o late Shri Raj Naraya Pareek (2/2) Ganesh Narain Pareek S/o Roop Narain (since deceased) through legal representatives:- (2/2/1) Smt. Madhu W/o late Shri Ganesh Narain (2/2/2) Kum. Gargi Pareek D/o Late Shri Ganesh Narain (2/2/3) Kum. Shubham D/o late Shri Ganesh Narain (2/2/4) Shri Arnav S/o late Shri Ganesh Narain All resident of Ramgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 3. The Revenue Appellate Authority, Alwar. 4. The Assistant Collector, Alwar District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Goyal for Mr. R.K Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC Mr. Pawan Pareek Mr. Raghvendra Singhh Khichi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present controversy stands duly covered by judgment of the Full Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in Tara & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. dated 15.07.2015, reported in 2015 (3) WLC (Raj.) 548. However, it is also not disputed that against the said judgment Civil Appeal Nos. 3969/2017 to 3975/2017 titled as Mahant Damodar Dass Versus State of [2026:RJ-JP:10850] (3 of 4) [CW-2855/1989] Rajasthan & Ors. is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and even an order directing parties to maintain status quo has been passed therein. 2. Learned counsel for the parties have also drawn the attention of this Court to the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 340/1999 titled as Munni & Ors. Versus Board of Revenue for Rajasthan & Ors. dated 06.09.2023 and in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14645/2022 titled as Tunda & Ors. Versus Murti Mandir Shri Baldev Ji Maharaj & Ors. dated 27.05.2025. 3. Vide the said orders, the abovementioned writ petitions have been disposed of directing the parties to maintain status quo while taking note of the judgment passed by the Full Bench of this Court and so also the pendency of the matter and the interim order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 4. In view thereof, the present writ petition also stands disposed of being covered by the judgment of the Full Bench in case of Tara (supra). 5. However, the parties will remain governed by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and status quo shall be maintained by both the parties till the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The State Government will be at liberty to take any action, if so, required, only subsequent to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6. With the said directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. Liberty is granted to the parties to revive the writ petition, if need so arises. [2026:RJ-JP:10850] (4 of 4) [CW-2855/1989] 8. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIKSHA MISHRA /1