APHC010285532011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 31060/2011 Between: 1. Y.LAKSHMI REDDY,CHITTOOR, S/O RAMASUBBA REDDY, PROPRIETOR M/S.LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA AGENCIES, OFFICE AT D.NO.18-8-5A, TIRUMALA BYPASS ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TTD REP BY EX OFFICER CHITTOOR ANOTHER, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE HEALTH OFFICER TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM TTD, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the second respondent in not including the packaged drinking water in the trade license issued vide proceedings in Roc.No.HE5/42/HO/TTD/Tml/2011, dated 18.4.2011, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the second respondent to take into consideration the report of Central Food Laboratory, Pune, dated 24.5.2011 and to include packaged drinking water in the said trade license IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 38532 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.7.2011 in the light of report of Central Food Laboratory, Pune, dated 24.5.2011, pending disposal of the Writ Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the Petitioners/ respondents in writ petition to file counter affidavit by condoning the delay and consequently order to receive the counter affidavit on record and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD) 2. C SRINIVASA BABA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 31060/2011 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.09.2026 KA/KBN 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 31060/2011 Date: 07.09.2026 KA/KBN