Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9850 (BOM)

M/S LALITNIRMAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD v. SUNILA SUDHIR MANERIKAR AND ANR

WP/4181/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17 WP-4181-2026 TO 21-WP-4186-2026.DOC skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4181 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4182 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4183 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4184 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4186 OF 2026 M/s. Lalitnirman Business Development Pvt Ltd & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Sunila Sudhir Manerikar and Anr. …Respondents Mr. Akshay Bankapur, for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026 P. C.: 1. At the outset, Mr. Jadhav, learned APP states that there is an alternate remedy of revision. 2. In view of the said contention, Mr. Akshay Bankapur, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petitions with liberty to avail alternate remedy. 3. Liberty as sought is granted. 22nd September, 2026 17 WP-4181-2026 TO 21-WP-4186-2026.DOC skt 4. Accordingly, Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. 5. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 22nd September, 2026