Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010012352026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 132/2026 Between:
1. TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY, S/O SRI NARAYANA MOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, D.NO. 8-1088, SATTI SOMI REDDY COMPLEX, RAVULAPALEM (V), KOTHAPET (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. G KANTHU, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R B CIRCLE, KAKINADA. 2
2. B RAMU R4, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B DIVISION, AMALAPURAM. 3.
3. PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, (R5) THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notices to the respondents/contemnors herein and punish the Respondents/Contemnors under Secs. 10 to 12 of The
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble High Court dated 03.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.6780 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 03.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.6780 of 2024.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that order dated 03.07.2025 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.04.2026 IKN