Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9847 (ORI)

BIJAYA KUMAR SAHOO v. TAHASILDAR, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, DHENKANAL

WP(C)/2941/2026 · 2026-01-29

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2941 of 2026 Bijaya Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. B.M. Sarangi, Advocate -versus- Tahasildar, Kamakhyanagar, Dist.- Dhenkanal and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Nayak, A.G.A. CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 29.01.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. B.M. Sarangi, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. D. Nayak, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties. 2. Considering the limited grievance of the Petitioner that his representation is pending before the Tahasildar, Kamakhyanagar, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Tahasildar, Kamakhyanagar, Dist.-Dhenkanal (Opposite Party No.1) to consider the prayer of the Petitioner as per his representation dated 12.01.2026 under Annexure-2 and dispose of the same, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition. 3. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge B.K. Barik