Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9843 (JHR)

NEJAM SHAH ALIAS NEJAM UDDIN SHAH ALIAS NIJAM SHAH v. THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND

A.B.A./242/2026 · 2026-01-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:1381] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 242 of 2026 Nejam Shah @ Nejam Uddin Shah @ Nijam Shah, aged about 47 years, S/o-Kudus Shah, R/o Village- Panchayat Bodgo Block, Nawagarh, Raj Dhanwar, Jahanadih, P.O.- Nawagadh Chatti, P.S.- Dhanwar, District-Giridih. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 19.01.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 of the IPC), pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and the altercation took place due to land dispute. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner of making assault. He further submits that both the sides have received injuries. He also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there and the injury [2026:JHHC:1381] -2- is said to be grievous in nature. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation and the injury received by the informant, pursuant to whose blow is not clear and further there are case and counter case between the parties and both the sides have received injuries and petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of her surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-19.01.2026 Amitesh/-