Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9841 (UTT)

VIRENDRA KUMAR v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION /ADM NAZUL

WPMS/3164/2016 · 2026-08-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010027302016 2026:UHC:7371 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3164/2016 Virendra Kumar --Petitioner Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation /adm Nazul --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. K.R. Gazi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the respondent. 2. Mr. Khalid Rehman Gazi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that civil litigation pending between the parties has been decided based on a compromise. He thus submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous in view of subsequent developments. 3. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent also supports the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Mahinder