Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9841 (BOM)

AMIT SUDAM GUJAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APEAL/769/2026 · 2026-09-21

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 27-APEAL 769-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.769 OF 2026 Amit Sudam Gujar … Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ----- Mr. Sudeep Pasbola, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Naagesh Khedkar and Mr. Amar Gujar i/by. Mr. Rohan Hogle for the Appellant. Mr. Yogesh Dabake, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Anshuman R. Asare i/by. Mr. Mayur Dodake, Mr. Ankur Pahade, Mr. Salman Pathan, Ms Kirti Ahuja, Mr. Sahil Katare and Adv. Nauman Pathan for Respondent No.2. PSI Chetan Dhanavade, Uttamnagar Police Station is present. ----- CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 21.09.2026 P.C. : 1. The learned Senior Advocate for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal after six months, if the trial is not concluded by that time. 2. Leave granted. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) Dinesh 1 of 1