Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9840 (ALL)

DADAN LAL v. DEVENDRA YADAV AND 8 OTHERS

A227/13825/2026 · 2026-09-30

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13825 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was allowed by trial court. According to petitioner, as defendants have violated the interim injunction, an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC was filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Misc. Application No. 487 of 2023 filed by plaintiff-petitioner under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Original Suit No. 480 of 2018, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dadan Lal .....Petitioner(s) Devendra Yadav And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad