HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16082 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rama Nand Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing of the order dated 23.06.2025 passed by respondent no.3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that against the impugned order, there is an alternative remedy of filing appeal available to the petitioner before the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board under Rule 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973. Therefore, this petition should be dismissed for this reason. On the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this petition with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board, within four weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order and, if any such appeal is filed, the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, ignoring the delay, if any, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties expeditiously, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the said appeal. October 1, 2026 Jitendra/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rama Nand Pandey (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Ramkant Saxena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad