Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9833 (UTT)

INDRAJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/1057/2023 · 2026-08-14

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010187352023 2026:UHC:7289 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/1057/2023 Indrajeet Singh --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Rakshit Shrivastava, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has already been compounded. As such, the present Anticipatory Bail Application has rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since the matter has already been compounded, nothing survives for consideration in the present application. 4. Accordingly, the present Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 14-08-2026 SB SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa0 8b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0 A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.17 10:41:54 +05'30'