Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9833 (BOM)

B B RAJENDRA PRASAD v. UNION OF INDIA

CP/735/2025 · 2026-09-21

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

35.CP.735.2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 735 OF 2025 B B Rajendra Prasad ....Petitioner V/S Union Of India & Ors. ....Respondents Mr. K. H. Holambe Patil a/w. Mr. Krishna Holamabe, Mr. Nitin S. Murkute for the Petitioner Mr. Dashrath Dube a/w. Mr. Rupesh D. Dubey for the Respondents. CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. Mr. Dube, learned Counsel appears for the Respondents. He has tendered certain documents whereby he tried to impress upon the Court that a letter/communication was addressed to the Petitioner for furnishing certain documents and necessary information. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. He makes a statement that the judgment and order of this Court dated 26th September, 2023 has not been assailed before the Hon’ble Apex Court by the Respondents. He submits that in case the information and details are submitted by the Petitioner, the Order dated 26th September, 2023 shall be complied with by the Respondents without any further delay. A copy of the said communication/instructions is also furnished to the Petitioner’s Counsel. 2. Once a positive statement of facts has been made by the Respondents as noted above, no purpose would be served to keep this matter pending. AKN 1 ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2026.09.22 11:19:18 +0530 35.CP.735.2025.doc 3. We direct that the Order dated 26th September, 2023 is positively complied within one month from the date of uploading of this Order, failing which parties are at liberty to move for recall of this Order. 4. The Contempt Petition is Disposed Of in the above terms. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] AKN 2