Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058612026
2026:GAU-AS:9892
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/642/2026 MANOHAR AKAND S/O-LOKMAN AKAND, R/O-WARD NO 10, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783301 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS, MR. B HUSSAIN,MR S A BARBHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 20-07-2026
Heard Mr. R Mali appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel for the accused/applicant. Also heard Mr. B Sharma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State respondent. 2. This is an application u/s 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
Page No.# 2/3 (BNSS), 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Dhubri P.S. Case No. 42/2026 (G.R. Case No. 03/2026) u/s 281/125(a)/61(2)/126(2)/117(2)/109(1)/303(2)/296/351(3)/3(5) of of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 07.02.2026 by the informant alleging that on 07.02.2026 in the morning while he was going to Happy Convent School to Dhubri to drop his daughter, at Bidyapara Tiniali, one e-rickshaw driven in a rash and negligent manner collided with the motor-cycle of the informant. It was alleged that as a result, the minor daughter of the informant got certain injuries. It was also alleged that he took a photograph of the e-rickshaw to inform the police and on seeing that accused/applicant threatened the informant. While he was coming back after dropping his daughter in school, it was alleged that the accused/applicant along with some other persons had assaulted him. On receipt of the FIR, police registered the Dhubri P.S. Case No. 42/2026 under the afore- mentioned sections. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant submits that the accused/applicant was granted interim bail by this Court vide order dated 23.03.2026 and he submits that the injury as alleged is absolutely simple in nature and therefore, the interim order passed in the instant case should be made absolute. 5. Taking into account the entire facts of the case as well as upon hearing the counsel appearing for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that the interim pre-arrest bail order passed on 23.03.2026 is hereby made absolute. 6.
Accordingly, the instant AB application is disposed of making absolute the
Page No.# 3/3 interim pre-arrest bail order dated 23.03.2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant