HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41871 of 2026 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the informant, and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 528 BNSS application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 787 of 2023 (State Vs. Nazeem Vs Satyaveer and others), Under Sections 392, 323, 452, 504 I.P.C. Police Station Balaini, District Baghpat on the basis of compromise dated-30.01.2025, pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division (S.D.), Baghpat. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Hon'ble Court by filing Application U/s 528 BNSS bearing No.10755 of 2026 with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 18.03.2026 sent the matter to trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 18.04.2026 identified and verified the parties through their counsel as well as compromise application, the same has been annexed as Annexure 5 to the affidavit. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their private and civil dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the Court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar Singh, Nishant Kumar Singh, Ramanand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyaveer And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, the impugned entire proceeding of Complaint No. 787 of 2023 (State Vs. Nazeem Vs Satyaveer and others), Under Sections 392, 323, 452, 504 I.P.C. Police Station Balaini, District Baghpat, pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division (S.D.), Baghpat, is hereby quashed. 8. This application under Section 528 BNSS is accordingly allowed. September 30, 2026 Nitin Verma NA528 No. 41871 of 2026 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad