[2026:RJ-JP:25336] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10066/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18699U / 2026 Devi Singh S/o Parsadi Lal, Aged About 72 Years, R/o 286, Laxmi Nagar, Kakaji Ki Kothi, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Special Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 07/07/2026 1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 BNSS in connection with F.I.R. No.144/2020 registered at Police Station-Mathuragate, District-Bharatpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was initially lodged against the petitioner on 01.03.2020 alleging that, forgery and cheating in a document which were executed in the year 1995 has been committed after almost 15 years. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after thorough investigation, the Investigating Agency found the case to be of civil nature and submitted a negative final report. Thereafter, the complainant filed a protest petition, and on the said protest [2026:RJ-JP:25336] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10066/2026] petition, the learned Trial Court took cognizance vide order dated 29.09.2023 and summoned the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the offences are non-bailable. Therefore, he has an apprehension that the learned Trial Court may rejected the bail application of the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to participate in the proceedings before the learned Trial Court. He, therefore, submits that the anticipatory bail application may be allowed. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. Considering the fact that the offences are cognizable, non- bailable and since the petitioner has been called upon the through summons there may be apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that his bail application may be rejected. 8. Considering the fact that the Investigating Agency has placed the negative final report and further the petitioner has been called upon through summons. No purpose would be served, if his bail application is rejected by the learned Trial Court, this Court deems it appropriate to pass the following order. 9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 BNSS is disposed of in the following terms: (i) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on or before 13.07.2026. If the petitioner appears on or before 13.07.2026, the learned Trial Court shall accept the bail bonds furnished by the petitioner as it [2026:RJ-JP:25336] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10066/2026] deems appropriate and release the petitioner on bail with such conditions as the learned Trial Court may consider fit and proper. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 68/KRATIKA