Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9826 (CAL)

SUFIYA KHATUN @ SHAMPA KHATUN @ MAJEDA BIBI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/645/2026 · 2026-04-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026. Sl. No.26 Ct. No. 35 SG [Allowed] C.R.M. (NDPS) 645 of 2026 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with NDPS Case No. 175 of 2025 arising out of Sagarpara PS Case No. 884 of 2025 dated 25.09.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Sufiya Khatun @ Shampa Khatun @ Majeda Bibi. … Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Mr. Anisur Rahaman. ...for the petitioner. Mr. Antarikhya Basu, Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha. …for the State. 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits the subject matter of case relates to alleged recovery of 110 bottles of phensedyl from the petitioner and another person. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected as investigation was still pending. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits in the meantime charge-sheet has been submitted. 2. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the contention that investigation has already been completed. 3. Having considered the quantum of seizure in the present case and the period of detention for more than six months, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 2 4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Sufiya Khatun @ Shampa Khatun @ Majeda Bibi shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under NDPS Act-cum-Additional Sessions Judge, 5th Court, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Murshidabad, without the prior permission of the learned special court. 5. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 645 of 2026 is allowed. 6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)