1 2026:CGHC:20768 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4533 of 2022 Bhagirathi Prasad Bisai S/o Late Shri Parmanand Bisai Aged About 78 Years R/o Ward No. 24 Nayapara, Thana And Tahsil Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Municipal Corporation Mahasamund Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, Daganiya, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer For Respective Respondents : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.04 17:42:57 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 04.05.2026 1 By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by quashing the impugned order dated 16.08.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent No. 6 Executive Engineer CSPDCL Mahasamund. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be please to direct the respondents authority to determine the compensation and rent from 2004 to the date of removal of electricity equipment from the petitioner land. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be please to issue an appropriate writ commanding and directing the respondents authority to remove the transformer as well as Electric pole from the petitioner land. 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favor of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the competent authorities for removal/relocation of the transformer and electric poles from the 3 petitioner’s land, and for consideration of compensation, in accordance with law. 3 Learned counsel for the respective respondents have no objection to the said prayer. 4 Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh