KACHUMARA ANDABHANGA MAHCHERA BAZAR ANCHALIK UNNAYAN SAMITY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
WP(C)/741/2026 · 2026-07-19
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9824 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9824 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010026872026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/741/2026 KACHUMARA ANDABHANGA MAHCHERA BAZAR ANCHALIK UNNAYAN SAMITY REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, VILLAGE- MAHCHERA, P.O.
KACHUMARA, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM.
2: NUR SALAM S/O SHARIF UDDIN PRESIDENT OF KACHUMARA ANDABHANGA MAHCHERA BAZAR ANCHALIK UNNAYAN SAMITY VILLAGE- KASHIMPUR P.O. KACHUMARA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT AND RURA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, JURIPARA, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI-37 2:THE BARPETA ZILA PARISHAD BARPETA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPETA ZILA PARISHAD P.O. AND DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM.
3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPETA ZILA PARISHAD BARPETA P.O. AND DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM.
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CHENGA REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. CHENGA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM 6:NO 89 MAHCHERA GAON PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY NO. 89 MAHCHERA GAON PANCHAYAT P.O. MAHCHERA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM.
7:SRI SONOWAR HUSSAIN S/O LATE SOBOR ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KASHIMPUR P.O. AND P.S. KACHUMARA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K AZAD, MR M HUSSAIN,MR. N HAQUE,MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. K M HASSAN(R7),MR. J I BORBHUIYA(R7),SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 20.07.2026 Shri A. K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the challenge was with regard to a settlement, the tenure of which is over and therefore, there is no live cause of action to be adjudicated. Also heard Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD as well as Shri M.
Page No.# 3/3 Chetia, learned State Counsel. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant