Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010161312024
2026:UHC:7152 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2780/2024
Pradeep and another --Petitioners Versus District Magistrate Haridwar and others --Respondents
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate for respondent no. 6.
4.
Learned counsel for the parties are unanimous on the point that the relief sought in the writ petition do not survive, in view of subsequent developments.
5. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a13 1bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D 653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.12 17:53:48 +05'30'