VIPLAV PRAKASH MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/16111/2026 · 2026-09-30
Siddharth Nandan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16111 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Heard Shri V.K. Ojha, Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following relief:-
"(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authority to grant the revised salary matrix Level-8 Rs.64,100/- by reckoning the period since final selection list dated 23.08.2016 and also grant the first increment benefits in the month of July, 2017. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authority to pay the revised salary matrix Level-8 Rs.64,100/- by considering the date of final selection list dated 23.08.2016 and also to grant the increments benefits with all consequential benefits along with arrears. c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authority to grant the selection pay scale in October, 2026 by reckoning to the 10 years of service from the date of the final selection list dated
23.08.2026. d) Issue a writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the due consideration shall be accorded to the claim of petitioner as per law. 4. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition pending and on the consent of the parties the writ petition is being decided at the admissions stage itself by providing that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation for redressal of his / her grievance along with the certified copy of this order within 7 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.K. Ojha, Vikas Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Viplav Prakash Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
preferably within the further period of two months from the date of receiving of the said representation before him. 5. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.
October 1, 2026 Israr WRIA No. 16111 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ISRAR AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad