Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058612026 2026:GAU-AS:9894 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AB/683/2026 NAJIMUDDIN AKOND ALIAS NAZIMUDDIN AKOND AND 2 ORS. S/O FAJLUR RAHMAN AKOND R/O WARD NO 10 PO AND PS DHUBRI ASSAM 2: SAHINUR AKOND S/O NAZIMUDDIN AKOND R/O WARD NO 10 PO AND PS DHUBRI ASSAM 3: ROCKY UDDIN AKOND S/O NAZIMUDDIN AKOND R/O WARD NO 10 PO AND PS DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR SAURADEEP DEY Advocate for : PP Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 20-07-2026 Heard Mr. D K Agarwala, the learned counsel for the accused/applicants. Also heard Mr. B Sharma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State respondent. 2. This is an application u/s 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicants in connection with Dhubri P.S. Case No. 42/2026 (G.R. Case No. 03/2026) u/s 281/125(a)/61(2)/126(2)/117(2)/109(1)/303(2)/296/351(3)/3(5) of of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 07.02.2026 by the informant alleging that on 07.02.2026 in the morning while he was going to Happy Convent School to Dhubri to drop his daughter, at Bidyapara Tiniali, one e-rickshaw driven in a rash and negligent manner collided with the motor-cycle of the informant. It was alleged that as a result, the minor daughter of the informant got certain injuries. It was also alleged that he took a photograph of the e-rickshaw to inform the police and on seeing that accused/applicant threatened the informant. While he was coming back after dropping his daughter in school, it was alleged that the accused/applicant along with some other persons had assaulted him. On receipt of the FIR, police registered the Dhubri P.S. Case No. 42/2026 under the afore- mentioned sections. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicants submits that two persons are involved in the incident and they have been falsely implicated in the instant case and he submits that some accused/persons have already been granted bail. Therefore, he submits that the accused/applicants are also apprehending arrest, may be released on pre-arrest bail. 5. Taking into account the entire facts of the case as well as upon hearing the counsel appearing for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that the accused/applicants should be granted pre-arrest bail. 6. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused/applicants, namely, [1] Najimuddin Akond @ Nazimuddin Akond and [2] Sahinur Akond should be released on bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority subject to the conditions that:- i. the accused/applicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of 10 (ten) days from passing of this order. ii. the accused/applicants shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when called for. iii. that the accused/applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 7. In terms of the aforesaid direction, the AB application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant