Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9817 (JHR)

RAJESH SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6296/2025 · 2026-02-04

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:2979 ) --1-- A.B.A. No. 6296 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6296 of 2025 ---- 1. Rajesh Saw, aged about 30 years, son of Karu Saw, 2. Karu Saw, aged about 55 years, S/o- Late Khayru Saw, All R/o-village-Kumhardih, P.O.-Tantri, P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Special P.P. ---- 03/04.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 20(b)(ii)/22 of the N.D.P.S. Act, pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the name of the petitioners has come in the confessional statement and the contraband has been seized from the possession of the apprehended persons, namely, Sonu Kumar Ray and Subhash Saw and quantity was 1.006 kgs. He also submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition. He next submits that the allegations have been made that from the house of the petitioner no. 2, the said seizure has been made, however, the said house was let out on rent to Sonu Ray. ( 2026:JHHC:2979 ) --2-- A.B.A. No. 6296 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners. 5. Considering that petitioner No. 2 had let out on rent the house to Sonu Ray and Subhash Saw, who have been apprehended from there. The petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition and on query made by the Court, learned counsel for the State has stated the case diary and also in the counter affidavit filed by the State are silent on the point of criminal antecedent, I am inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 04.02.2026 Nandini/ Uploaded on: 07.02.2026