Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010119442026
2026:GAU-AS:9779
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1281/2026 SRI ANUPAM BORAH AND 3 ORS.
S/O-LT. CHAN MOHAN DAS,304,GOLDEN TOWER,BHGHORBORI TINALI,PANJABARI,DIST-KAMRUP (M),ASSSAM 2: SRI ANUPAM OJAH SON OF LATE KARNADHAR OJAH RESIDENT OF WARD NO.-08 CHANDANPUR BARPETA ROAD DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM 3: SRI DHIRAJ BHARALI ALIAS RINKU BHARALI SON OF SRI TARUN BHARALI RESIDENTS OF BARPETA ROAD TOWN WARD NO. 8 MOUZA GOBARDHANA P.S. BARPETA ROAD DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM.
4: SRI BHAGAWAN PATHAK SON OF - PARAMESWAR PATHAK RESIDENT OF GOBARDHANA P.S. BARPETA ROAD DISTRICT BARPETA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P DUTTA, MS. P P DAS,MS P SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 17.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Pursuant to the interim protection granted vide Order dated 15.06.2026, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement has been recorded. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, upon instructions from the I.O., that no injury report is available as no injury was caused to the informant. Having regard to the above, as well as the nature of the allegations, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. The interim order dated 15.06.2026 is hereby made absolute. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant