SRI CHIRANTHANA KAVYODAYA EDUCATION SOCIETY (R) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/1680/2026 · 2026-02-11
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9810 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9810 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1680 OF 2026 (EDN-GIA) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI CHIRANTHANA KAVYODAYA EDUCATION SOCIETY (R) TURUVEKERE TOWN, TUMKURU DISTRICT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY REGD. UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT 1960
2.
VASANTHKUMAR A S S/O SHIVALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC ASST TEACHER
3.
SUNIL KUMAR M S/O MOTHINAIK AGED ABOUT 40 OCC ASST TEACHER
4.
MARULASIDDAPPA H C S/O CHANDRASHEKAR H S AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS OCC ASST TEACHER
5. DAKSHAYINI D/O K B MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS OCC ASST TEACHER
6.
SHEELA C R D/O RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS OCC ASST TEACHER
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 6 ARE WORKING AT CHIRANTHANAKAVYODAYA KANNADA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL MAYASANDRA-572 221 TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
3.
THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADM), TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU-572101
5.
BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMAKURU-572 101
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH K., HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES MORE PARTICULARLY THE R1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 03.05.2023 AND 15.09.2023 MADE BY THE PETITIONER NO. 1
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
TO ALL THE RESPONDENTS THROUGH R5 IN TERMS OF THE ANNEXURE-M AND P RESPECTIVELY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: a) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent authorities more particularly the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to consider the representations dated 03.05.2023 and 15.09.2023 made by the Petitioner No.1 to all the respondents through Respondent No.5 in terms of the Annexures-M and P respectively.
b) Further, issue directions against the respondents to extend the Grant-in-Aid benefits to the school running under the petitioner no. 1 in terms of the Government
Order dated 06.10.2007 Bearing No: ED 59 PMC 2006 produced at Annexure-D and letters of recommendations dated 13.01.2015 bearing No. C7(4)/Pra.shi.A/itahare 01/2014-15 issued by the Respondent No.2 as per Annexure-F and also in terms of the recommendation for Grant-in-Aid submitted by the Respondent No.5 by its letter dated 06.05.2022 produced at Annexure-L.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
c) Issue any Writ, order or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstance of the case and for cost, in the interest of justice and equity.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will not press the relief sought at prayer B. Hence he confined the petition only to the extent of prayer A.
3.
Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:
4. The petitioners filed this petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to consider the representations dated 03.05.2023 and 15.09.2023 made by the petitioner No.1 to all the respondents through respondent No.5 in terms of Annexures M and P respectively, wherein the petitioners requested the respondents for admission of grant-in-aid, and the respondents have not passed any order on the said representations. Hence, this petition.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that if reasonable time is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 3, they would consider the representations vide Annexures M and P, and would pass the appropriate order in accordance with law.
6. In view of the above the submission made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, I proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER i. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider Annexures M and P and pass the appropriate order in terms of the Government Order dated 06.10.2006 vide Annexure-D, in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8457 WP No. 1680 of 2026
ii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS