Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 981 (JHR)

RANCHI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH ITS PARTNER MALKIAT SINGH v. SMT. ALKA TIWARY, THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/187/2026 · 2026-02-20

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5250-DB Page 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 187 of 2026 ----- Ranchi Construction Company through its Partner Malkiat Singh, Aged about 86 years, Son of Late Didar Singh, resident of Anantpur, 3rd Street, P.O. – Doranda, P.S. Chutia, District- Ranchi, (Jharkhand) … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Alka Tiwary, the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. Mr. Mast Ram Meena, the Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. Mr. Brajnandan Kumar, the Engineer-in-Chief, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. – Doranda, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4. Mr. Niranjan Kumar, the Regional Chief Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Ranchi Region, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Ranchi. 5. Mr. Shankar Das, the Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Urban Circle, Doranda P.O. & P.S. – Doranda, Ranchi 6. Mr. Kartik Bhagat, the Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Hatia Project, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Doranda Ranchi. 7. The State of Jharkhand. … … … Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Bhola Nath Rajak, Advocate For the State :Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate ------ Order No.05/Dated 20th February, 2026 1. Mr. Bhola Nath Rajak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, has submitted that the order passed by this Court, which is the subject matter of the present contempt case, has been complied with. 2. Considering the compliance of the aforesaid order, there is no need to proceed further in the contempt case. 2026:JHHC:5250-DB Page 2 3. Accordingly, the instant contempt case, being Contempt Case (Civil) No. 187 of 2026, is disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 20.02.2026 Umesh/Abhishek