Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9808 (CHH)

CHRISTION WELFARE SOCIETY RAJNANDGAON v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2063/2026 · 2026-04-28

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19780-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2063 of 2026 1 - Christion Welfare Society Rajnandgaon Through its Chairman, Christopher Paul Near Nuri Masjid, Gali No. 02, Gauri Nagar Ward, Tahsil and District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Chief Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Thakre, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 29-04-2026 1. Heard Mr. Ajay Thakre, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned Advocate General appearing for the State. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.04.29 20:46:43 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s)- “10.1) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to declare said chapter 3 part 4 clause 3 of the “The Chhattisgarh Dharma Swatantraya Vidheyak 2026” unconstitutional and stuck down the same. 10.2) Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 3. As vide order dated 24-04-2026 we have already dismissed WPC No.1960 of 2026 being premature one and the present petition is squarely covered by the same order, the present petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that he has filed I.A. No.01/2026 for withdrawal of the present petition. 5. In view of the above, I.A. No.01/2026 is allowed and the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition as and when occasion arises. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil