Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9804 (CAL)

SAMIR KUMAR CHAKROBORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/4926/2026 · 2026-04-17

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026 rc/ct.no.15 Item No.31 WPA No. 4926 of 2026 Samir Kumar Chakraborty Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debasis Sur Mr. Dilip Kumar Das Ms. Rekha Das Mr. Mrinmoy Chatterjee ..for the petitioner Mrs. Sabnam De Bardhan Mrs. Kakali Naskar ….for the State Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner and report submitted by the State are taken on record. Copy of the report is made over to the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court this day. None appears for the Panchayat and the private respondents despite service. The petitioner alleges that the private respondents are transforming an old well into a septic tank adjoining the boundary wall of the petitioner which is creating nuisance and health hazards for the petitioner and his family members. The petitioner seeks to submit a comprehensive representation in this regard before the Pradhan, Jamragam Mondal Gram Panchayat, being the 2nd respondent herein, within 7 days from date. Such liberty is granted. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same within six weeks from the date of receipt thereof upon granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent, in accordance with law. The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the parties within a week thereof. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh,J) 2