RAJESH YADAV ALIAS RAJESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS RAJESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./337/2026 · 2026-02-26
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9803 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9803 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5762 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 337 of 2026
Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar aged about 19 years, son of Hari Yadav @ Harihar Yadav, Resident of Village- Nawakhap, P.O.- Danto Khurd, P.S.- Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribag
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate
---
02/26.02.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2025 in connection with Hazaribag Muffasil P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 310(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita said to have been pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Hazaribag
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. He has referred to paragraph 7 of the bail application to submit that name of the petitioner has surfaced on the confessional statement of the co-accused persons namely Ranvir Kumar Singh @ Chotu @ Jokar, Vipul Kumar Singh, Sunni Kumar Gupta and Rahul Kumar Yadav. Learned counsel has also referred to paragraph 16 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
4.
Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner has not been put on T.I. parade and the co-accused namely Sunny Kumar Gupta and Rahul Kumar Yadav have been enlarged on bail.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer of the petitioner.
2026:JHHC:5762 2
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused and charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as submitted by the petitioner , and two co-accused have been granted bail, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Hazaribag in connection with Hazaribag Muffasil P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
7. The learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent report of the petitioner before releasing the petitioner on bail as one of the grounds for granting bail to the petitioner is that it has been submitted by the petitioner that he has no criminal antecedent.
8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
9. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 26.02.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-26.02.2026