[2026:RJ-JP:25160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7269/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13231U / 2026 Amritlal @ Imratlal S/o Jagannath, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Gatula Camera Khurd, Tetra, District Muraina (Madhya Pradesh). (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli, District Karauli) ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal, with Mr. Pranav Sharma, Mr. Aditya Gupta, Mr. Keshav Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. Mr. Manish Kumar Meena, Mr. Gopal Lal ASI, P.S. Mandrayal, District Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 06/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 06.04.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karauli, (Raj.), in Bail Application No.152/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.27/2026, Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 108 of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time therefore, he prays that the [2026:RJ-JP:25160] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7269/2026] petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 06.05.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he had taken a loan of ₹5,80,000/- from the deceased-Vinod, which was not repaid. It is further alleged that when the deceased demanded repayment of the loan amount, the petitioner and his wife threatened deceased, stating that if he continued to demand the money, they would implicate him in false criminal cases. It is alleged that, on account of these threats, the deceased committed suicide. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that there is nothing on record to indicate that instigation of any nature so as to pursuade to deceased to commit suicide on record. He also submits the FSL report has not yet not been produced whether the handwriting is of the deceased or not. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Amritlal @ Imratlal S/o Jagannath arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 27/2026, Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli, shall be released on bail; provided he [2026:RJ-JP:25160] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7269/2026] furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 17/KRATIKA