HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9428 of 2026 Court No. - 66 (Sr. No.19 out of 116) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.549 of 2025, under Section 103(1) B.N.S., Police Station Phase-2 Noida, District Gautambuddh Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the FIR is prompt and that the applicant is the sole named accused therein, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 5. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously as early as possible in view of the principle as has been laid down in the recent judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 and Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shakti Dubey, Vinay Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. (Krishan Pahal,J.) March 19, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 9428 of 2026 2 Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad