Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9798 (PNJ)

HUKAM SINGH v. RAJ KUMAR, IFS DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

COCP/2179/2026 · 2026-05-07

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2179 IN THE HI 104 Hukam Sing Raj Kumar, I CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of 12245-2026 whereby the 03.04.2026 directed tha respondent N 2. hearing, follo 2179-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Singh Versus umar, IFS Deputy Conservator of Fore M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Mohan Sheoran, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 23.04.2026 (Ann 2026 titled as ‘Hukum Singh vs. by the Writ Court had stayed the 2026 impugned by the petitioner in d that the petitioner be allowed to dent No. 4 forthwith i.e. tomorrow by Yesterday i.e. 06.05.2026 wh g, following order has been passed by “Vide order dated 23.04 in CWP-12245-2026 titled as Haryana and others’, the W operation of order dated 03 petitioner in the said writ petit the petitioner be allowed to respondent No. 4 forthwith i.e. t On instructions from Sh. learned counsel for the respond the petitioner shall be positive tomorrow by 10:00 A.M. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2179-2026 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 .… Petitioner Forest .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-2) passed in CWP- vs. State of Haryana and others’, ed the operation of order dated ner in the said writ petition and ed to join duties in the office of ow by 10:00 A.M. 6 when this case was listed for ed by this Court:- 3.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) passed d as ‘Hukum Singh vs. State of e Writ Court had stayed the d 03.04.2026 impugned by the petition. It was also directed that to join duties in the office of i.e. tomorrow by 10:00 A.M. Sh. Raj Kumar, DFO, Gurugram, pondent-State has undertaken that itively allowed to join the duties ging ’, ated and e of for ed of he he at of m, at ies RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.07 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2179 3. State on inst in complian reproduced 09:30 A.M. 4. aforesaid su submits that and the same 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 07.05.2026 rishu 2179-2026 -2- In view of the above, the for tomorrow i.e. 07.05.2026 a 12:30 P.M. to ensure complianc Today, at the very outset, learne on instructions from Sh. Raj Kumar, D mpliance of the order dated 06.05. uced above, the petitioner has re A.M. Learned counsel for the peti aid submissions of learned counsel ts that in view of the above, nothing s e same may be disposed of, accordingl Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , the present petition is adjourned 26 and be taken up for hearing at liance.” ned counsel for the respondent- mar, DFO, Gurugram, submits that 06.05.2026 passed by this Court as rejoined the duties today at e petitioner has not disputed the unsel for the respondent-State and hing survives in the present petition rdingly. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ed at that at the and ition are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.07 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.