- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13512 WP No. 19442 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 19442 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. M/S POOLABE ASSOCIATES PROP MR KHALID ACHABBA POOLABE HOUSE KURLOTTU HOSANGADY VILLAGE POST PERINJE-574242 BELTHANGADY TALUK. 2. MR KHALID ACHABBA S/O MR ACCHABBA ABDULLA ALIAS ACCHA BYARI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS POOLABE HOUSE KURLOTTU HOSANGADY VILLAGE POST PERINJE-574242 BELTHANGADY TALUK. 3. MR MOHAMMED ADNAN S/O MR KHALID ACHABBA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS POOLABE HOUSE KURLOTTU HOSANGADY VILLAGE POST PERINJE-574242 BELTHANGADY TALUK. 4. MR MOHAMMED ADIL ANSAR S/O MR KHALID ACHABBA Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13512 WP No. 19442 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS POOLABE HOUSE KURLOTTU HOSANGADY VILLAGE POST PERINJE-574242 BELTHANGADY TALUK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD.,ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER STATE BANK OF INDIA VENUR BRANCH BELTHANGADY TALUK STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH 2ND FLOOR BENGALURU CITY BRANCH J C ROAD BENGALURU-560002 REPRESENTED BY MR NAGENDRA NAGAIAH S/O LATE NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NANDISH PATIL., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.08.2022 IN CRL.MISC 275/2022 PASSED BY THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAKSHINA KANNADA (ANNEXURE-B). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13512 WP No. 19442 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is of the year 2022. On 30.09.2022, an interim order was granted by this Court subject to the petitioners depositing Rs.48,00,000/-. The learned counsel for the respondent - Bank submits that the interim order is not complied with. When the matter came up before this Court on 04.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' on 05.03.2026. 2. Today when the matter came up there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RB