MUKHTIYAR HAIDER RIZVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/32312/2026 · 2026-09-23
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32312 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to dispose off the representation which is pending before him since 13.01.2023 and 13.01.2026. ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent for the demarcation of Land situated in Khevat No. 122 Khasra No. 816 Rakba 0.24 Hectare which is situated in Mauza Mathura Bangar Deeg Gate, Mathura."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that application for demarcation has been filed on behalf of the petitioner but the authorities have not taken any steps as such authorities be directed to consider the petitioner's application for demarcation.
4. Mr. Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submitted that no proper application for demarcation as prescribed under Section 24 of U.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Khare, Hemendra Gautam, Rashtrapati Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mukhtiyar Haider Rizvi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Revenue Code, 2006 has been filed, as such prayer made in the instant petition cannot be entertained.
5. I have considered the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and perused the record.
6. The prayer made in the instant petition cannot be entertained as proper application for demarcation as prescribed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has not been filed by the petitioner.
7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file proper application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the appropriate authority, which shall be considered by the authority concern in accordance with law. September 24, 2026 PS* WRIC No. 32312 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad