Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9790 (BOM)

MOHMMAD JALAL MOHD.KHAN AND ANR. v. KARIM ABBAS KAGDI AND ANR.

FA/1905/2003 · 2026-09-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16 Fa-1905-2003.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1905 OF 2003 Mohmmad Jalal Mohd.Khan And Anr. ...Appellants Vs. Karim Abbas Kagdi And Anr. ...Respondents ***** Ms. Ketki Gokhale (through VC) Advocate for the Appellants Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi for the Respondent No. 2 ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. As learned Advocate for the Appellants has expired, notice was issued to the Appellants. Notice on Appellant No. 1 -Mohammad Jalal Mohd. Khan could not be served as he was not found. There is bailiffs report. Appellant No. 2- Komar Jahan Mohd. Jalal is wife of Appellant No. 1. The same report can be considered for service on Appellant No. 2. Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2026.09.22 11:38:09 +0530 16 Fa-1905-2003.doc 2. No purpose will be served by keeping the appeal pending, hence it is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. If in the future, the Appellants may come forward, they are at liberty to file an application for restoration of the appeal. It will be considered on merits. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2